The new truancy program is not meant to criminalize anyone, says Anita Murphy, deputy superintendent of Rochester schools. Credit: PHOTO BY LAUREN PETRACCA

The Rochester school district kicked off the new school year with what officials say is a serious crackdown on attendance and truancy. The new effort, which is loosely based on a program used successfully in other New York school districts, will involve the broader community.

Officials say that poor attendance and high truancy rates are at least partly to blame for the Rochester district’s consistently low graduation rate, and there have been many unsuccessful efforts over the years to address these issues. Many students miss so much instruction that they cannot perform at grade level in core subjects without remedial help.

But solving the problems has been extremely difficult, and efforts are often complicated by the district’s shoddy recordkeeping.

Some schools have students on the rolls who no longer live within the district. And officials recently discovered that a sophisticated attendance software program automatically records students as present, unless teachers manually change the status.

Mayor Tom Richards says getting accurate attendance numbers is crucial to the credibility of the district’s new truancy program.

“We’re never going to get people to help us and participate if we’re not credible,” he says.

Truancy is generally defined as 20 or more unexcused or unexplained absences in a school year. Anita Murphy, the Rochester district’s deputy superintendent, says that on any given day, about 3,000 students or 10 percent of the district’s nearly 30,000 students may be absent. And she says that as many as 50 percent of students may be truant over the course of a school year, meaning they may have missed at least 20 days for unexplained reasons.

The new program is loosely based on what district officials call the “Yonkers Model,” a comprehensive approach to chronic truancy designed by Karl Bertrand, president of Program Design and Development, a consulting firm to public schools and municipalities. Rochester officials met with Bertrand, who provided them with a report showing dramatic results in the Yonkers and Mt. Vernon school systems.

The Yonkers Model assumes that school districts cannot solve truancy problems on their own, and that city and county services are integral to the approach. Before launching the Rochester program, school officials met with social service providers, as well as county and city officials, says Superintendent Bolgen Vargas.

Rochester’s new program initially focuses on grades K to 3 to give officials time to develop it, and to quickly correct any problems that arise.

The first step is to implement careful and consistent attendance-taking, Murphy says. Specific steps will be taken when students miss school. For instance, after a student misses three consecutive days, a letter will go home to his or her parents. After five days, district officials will visit the student’s home. Intervention continues to increase with the goal of finding out why the student isn’t in school.

“The whole point is figuring out what the problem is and getting kids the help they need,” Murphy says. “The United Way is going to provide us with a list of agencies that can provide services to families once we’ve figured out the problem.”

Another option, though Superintendent Bolgen Vargas says it’s a last resort, is contacting Child Protective Services when parents neglect to send their children to school.

An important note: the district’s new procedures, called the “Attendance and Absenteeism Rules and Responsibility” have not yet been reviewed by the school board, so some steps may change.

Some members of the school board are concerned about involving CPS in the new truancy effort. A program that is perceived as too punitive or as criminalizing parents or students may not succeed, says board member Van White, because many minority communities are already skeptical of these institutions.

But Murphy says criminalization is not the intent of the program.

“The whole point is to get kids to come to school, not criminalize them,” she says.

Still, district officials, including teachers are required by law to report any form of child neglect or abuse to CPS. That includes educational neglect, which in the Yonkers Model can trigger an investigation by the agency. Rochester’s school officials have historically been reluctant to use this approach.

That’s partly because some parents may simply not understand how important attendance is, especially for students in the lower grades, says Superintendent Vargas. Vargas was one of the state’s superintendents who pushed the Legislature to make kindergarten attendance mandatory in New York. The law was approved earlier this year.

Children need to be reading at grade level by the time they reach third grade, Vargas says. Poor attendance in the lower grades impedes developing reading skills, he says, and worse, it establishes a pattern of poor attendance.

But successful truancy reduction programs like the Yonkers Model rely heavily on taking forceful action sooner, with continuous follow-up on students and their families once the problem has been identified. The programs require rigorous management and coordination between many organizations, which board member White says has been a problem for the district in the past.

“People live and work in silos,” he says. “The walls are built on things like confidentiality that say they can’t communicate with the people working in other silos.”

White recalls the failure of a previous truancy effort between the district and the city.

“We had a truancy resolution back with [former superintendent] Manny Rivera for spending $1 million with the Rochester Police Department,” White says. But the plan got bogged down in a dispute over who paid for the police officers, he says, and a confrontation over the Maintenance of Effort Law. The MOE requires the city to provide the district with about $119.2 million in annual funding.

And White questions the district’s management capabilities, since the problems with attendance and truancy have been known for years. He says he began hearing parents’ complaints more than a decade ago: a child hadn’t been to school for days, but nobody from the district contacted the parents to let them know.

“This is not rocket science,” White says. “They’ve got ‘X’ number of kids who aren’t in their seats. This is not about poverty, and it’s not a matter of personnel or technology availability. The problem is the job isn’t getting done.”

I was born and raised in the Rochester area, but I lived in California and Florida before returning home about 12 years ago. I'm a vegetarian and live with my husband and our three pugs. I cover education,...

3 replies on “Truancy tests RCSD’s resolve”

  1. PARENTS PARENTS PARENTS PARENTS!!! Always the answer! Send your kid to school, make sure they go, discipline them if they don’t, and if you can’t handle that, DON’T HAVE KIDS!!!! Having kids isn’t like a disease that just happens, there is science behind it and a way to prevent it that I don’t think I need to explain.
    So many problems would be solved if people who can’t handle kids would stop popping them out, and when the school has to focus so much attention on getting lazy kids to school, other kids who made the effort to get there suffer.

  2. I agree with “Parents, parents. Parents”, but the second half of Havahd Street’s comment is classism through and through. A lot happens between birth and kindergarten. Adults get jobs and lose them, get married and divorced. Some get excellent parent mentoring and support; others are in a position of having to figure it out as they go along.

    I, too, am disposed to be highly critical of the parent who keeps their kid home for trivial reasons, and not always very charitable towards parents who haven’t figured out how to overcome obstacles on their own (“I figured it out, and I’m no rocket scientist”). That explains why I’m not a social worker. But I am charitable enough in my thinking to realize that is what social workers are for (“but for the grace of God go I”)

  3. Well, I AM a social worker (although I do not work for the County or for CPS), and this article concerns me greatly. It seems like a huge waste of resources for the RCSD to basically re-create their OWN CPS program, when they are required BY LAW to report educational neglect to CPS, anyways.

    Visiting the home, determining the problem and connecting to services is EXACTLY the role of CPS. Do Vargas & White not understand that CPS is a program of the Department of Health & Human Services, NOT of the RPD? A referral to CPS is not “criminalizing,” any more than a referral to DHHS for food stamps or Medicaid is criminalizing. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.

    And White’s saying that “…many minority communities are already skeptical of these institutions..”. I suspect that many people are also skeptical of the institution of the RCSD. Why does he think that people who are not sending their kids to school (and remember this program is geared toward K-3rd grade students so it is much more likely it is parents not getting their kids to school than the students skipping school) trust RCSD more than they would CPS?

    The district should spend its resources on its area of expertise- education. And make the appropriate referrals for the other issues its students and their families are facing.

Comments are closed.