Being
a Democrat in rural America, even in a
deep blue state like New York, isn’t always
easy.
The
nation’s rural outposts have never been completely hospitable to the type of
progressive, liberal agendas that thrive in urban areas — for a whole host of
reasons, reasons whose roots stretch back to pre-Revolutionary days. Instead
they’ve often harbored an independent, anti-establishment streak.
In
some parts of the country, that ethos is celebrated. And on the national level
conservative image managers, armed with little more than some down-home window-dressing,
have proven its resurgent appeal. For an example, look no further than the
current occupant of the White House. A little twang goes a long way.
But
for that rare subset of rural progressives in a progressive urban state,
there’s neither the solace of the conservatives’ oppositional brand of rural
identity politics, nor any real clout in their own ruling party.
Out
of the nearly 5.5 million registered Democrats in New York, considerably
fewer than a million hail from rural counties. If you don’t count smaller
cities like Binghamton, Utica, and Elmira or those of the mid Hudson Valley,
the number shrinks to nearly half a million. Even in a tight primary, statewide
Democratic candidates would be better off sticking to downstate in their campaigns,
where they’d able to court that many voters in any single borough of New York
City (except Staten Island).
That
simple math has meant that urban and downstate interests have all butdominated
politics in New York — and
especially in the state’s Democratic Party.
Over
a decade ago, frustration with that power dynamic culminated in the creation of
the Democratic Rural Conference. Party activists from about two-thirds of the
state’s most rural counties banded together to form a forum where their voices
would be heard. And they’ve found an effective way to do it: by holding their
statewide convention — and an accompanying straw poll for statewide races —
early in the year. That gives the poll a New Hampshire Primary-like leverage in
attracting the attention of urban and suburban Democrats.
The
straw poll may not mean much (its record of predicting ultimate winners is
mixed, at best), but it marks a turning point in the campaign season. It’s a
coming-out party of sorts, a chance for candidates to test their slogans and
prove themselves to potential donors. It’s too bad New York’s Republicans don’t
have a similar early-season event. (You could argue that the Conservative
Party’s convention, which also features statewide candidates laying out their
positions, qualifies, but it differs from the DRC straw poll since what happens
there actually has a significant impact on GOP candidacies.)
The big draw at this
year’s Democratic Rural Conference convention in Ithaca March 3 and 4 was the
match-up of Eliot Spitzer and Tom Suozzi. Spitzer,
now the state’s attorney general, has made a name for himself nationally as the
“sheriff of Wall Street” and up until recently was expected to march unimpeded
into the governor’s mansion. The DRC’s poll — just
a week after Nassau County Executive Suozzi defied
virtually every party leader and jumped into the race — was the first time
the two were pitted against each other. If the result means anything (and Suozzi’s team says it doesn’t), things are looking good for
Spitzer. He got 148 votes, while his upstart challenger fielded just seven.
But
that doesn’t mean the event hurts Suozzi, who got a
chance to make a pitch to some of the voters he’ll be relying on, all the while
maintaining his status as a party outsider. In a measure of how much of an
outsider he was, Suozzi was nominated by the DRC’s secretary, who qualified his nomination by saying, “I
do believe as Democrats we deserve a chance to hear from all our candidates.”
He read a brief bio of Suozzi off a crib sheet that someone
appeared to have handed him moments before, judging from his stumbling over a
few sentences. A “second” came anonymously from the crowd.
Still,
at some point, if he is to have any hope of winning or even showing well, Suozzi will have to get beyond his “I’m the good guy
because I’m the outsider and not beholden to any political bosses” shtick. His
brief speech provided at least one important preview of how he’ll go after
Spitzer when that time comes.
“The
difference between us is Eliot’s a prosecutor; I’m an executive,” Suozzi said. “We’re all going to say we’re reformers.
Eliot’s a reformer. But I’m a government reformer.”
Spitzer,
who’s been running a textbook frontrunner’s campaign, has barely acknowledged
that Suozzi’s in the race, let alone answered his
challenger’s criticism. At Ithaca, he stuck
pretty closely to that strategy.
“All
I’m going to be doing is what I’ve been doing,” he said. “Who my opponents are
or may be isn’t really going to affect how I run my campaign.”
Pressed
by reporters he finally drew a line, saying, “I’m not going to respond to
anything he has said.”
Yet
Suozzi’s dig on government reform seemed to strike a
nerve. Moments later, Spitzer broke with his stated decision not to respond.
“I
was talking about government reform years ago, and we have reformed
government,” he said in response to a reporter’s question.
Plenty of
politicians present probably wished they were facing Spitzer’s frontrunner dilemma,
especially those trying to fill the job he’s about to vacate.
Six
Democrats — Andrew Cuomo, Mark Green, Denise O’Donnell, Sean Patrick Maloney,
Charlie King, and Richard Brodsky — are vying for the party’s designation for
attorney general, making that the most interesting and contested poll of the
weekend. (Jeanine Pirro is the lone Republican
seeking the seat so far.)
Not
surprisingly, many of the candidates tailored their message to the Upstate
rural crowd.
Cuomo,
who brought a full entourage of young people waving signs and chanting “Andrew,
Andrew,” had campaign literature printed with the slogan “Justice for the 4
corners of New York.”
Others
used their time at the podium to show they had Upstate cred.
For pandering in a speech, the award has to go to Brodsky, an Assemblymember from WestchesterCounty, who touted
his Upstate beef ranch and claimed that he’d once won a medal for his baking at
a county fair.
“It
means I really know rural communities,” he told the crowd. The delegates, at
least, begged to differ, awarding Brodsky just four votes, the lowest of any
candidate for any office (with the exception of a few write-ins in other
races).
After
Cuomo, who received a majority of the votes with 79, the next highest vote
getter was Denise O’Donnell with 30. O’Donnell, a former US Attorney from Buffalo and the only
Upstate candidate for the job, said outright what the other candidates were
thinking. Referring to Spitzer’s 1998 DRC win that launched his successful
campaign for AG, she asked for the crowd for a repeat: “You took a risk on a
prosecutor that nobody’d heard of,” she said. “I’m
asking you to take another risk.”
After
O’Donnell in the voting came Charlie King with 18 votes, Mark Green with 17, Maloney with 8, and finally, the hapless Brodsky.
Brodsky’s four
votes meant he not only got fewer votes than Suozzi, but
also fewer than another dark-horse candidate. Jonathan Tasini
has taken on the task of mounting an intra-party challenge to New York’s Junior
Senator and the media’s favorite speculative presidential candidate, Hillary
Clinton.
Perhaps
it will come as a surprise to Conservative pundits, who’ve painted the former
first lady as the ultimate liberal, thatTasini is trying to outflank Clinton on the left
with his progressive creds. Most notably that means
opposition to the war in Iraq.
Quoting
Martin Luther King Jr., Tasini explained the motive
for his run — which he acknowledged wouldn’t likely get far: “Our lives begin
to end when we are silent about the things that matter.”
His
call for the impeachment of President Bush fielded some of the loudest and longest
applause of the morning, as did his condemnation of the Iraq war.
“We
are also responsible for the lost lives and money squandered,” he said. Perhaps
it was the anti-war stance, or perhaps just a bit of the trademark rural
iconoclasm at play, but Tasini walked away from the
Senate straw poll with nine votes (Clinton received the
other 126). That was two more than Suozzi, making Tasini the biggest surprise of the conference.
But
what does any of it mean? Arguably, very little.
Andrew Cuomo, for one, shouldn’t celebrate too much too soon. After all, it’s
not the first time he’s won a straw poll here. In 2002 he bested then
Comptroller Carl McCall in the DRC’s straw poll for
governor, then dropped out of that race before the
primary. Other DRC straw polls in the past have also failed to accurately
predict ultimate winners. If anything, the convention marks the end of Spring
Training and opening day in the regular season of earnest political hardball.
This article appears in Mar 15-21, 2006.
