Thursday night’s performance by the Rochester Philharmonic
Orchestra was essentially two concerts in one: the Stravinsky and everything
else. The Stravinsky was pure RPO. The rest? It was
billed as an “Evening in Paris,” but a better headline would be an “Evening in
Russia.”

Let’s begin with the performance of the Suite from “The
Firebird” (1919 revision). A ballet work in five parts, we last heard this
performed by the RPO just two years ago. It was written by Russian composer
Igor Stravinsky. Guest conductor Fabien Gabel may have talked to me last summer
about Stravinsky living for a time in Paris, but this work is Russian to the
core.

With five pieces on the program, “The Firebird” was last,
and snapped me back into Kodak Hall. The preceding works by Debussy, Saint-Saรซns,
and Ravel had not gone off particularly well. Then, abruptly, the entire RPO
was fully present in its performance, attentive to the conductor, and making
clean entrances. A full range of dynamics was provided. Ritardandos
were expressive. The arcs of the themes were long and luscious.

The French composers? Had I not
heard the Stravinsky, I might have said otherwise. But, with it in mind, my
simple comment is that the RPO did not grasp the French composers, and possibly
not the guest conductor.

It began with Claude Debussy’s “Prelude to the Afternoon of
a Faun.” Gabel had told me that for that piece, he can generally give the flute
the freedom to begin and simply take the musician’s inspiration from the
opening lines for the interpretation of the work. Unfortunately, the opening
did not put me into the French romantic “esprit.” It felt thoughtful and
measured, and that is where the whole piece, and the other French works, seemed
to go.

The problem can most clearly be explained by the deliveries
of the ends of phrases and the beginnings of the next beats. The French line
holding a diminuendo and ritardando is a slow sigh, a beat of the heart of
stillness; the inhale, and – then
the downbeat, and you go merrily on your way. You don’t count Debussy. You
breathe Debussy. The result of counting meant that entrances were smatterings
of notes, instead of clean, spring air in a public garden in Paris.

Where it really created problems was for the Concerto No. 3
in B minor for Violin and Orchestra, Op. 61. It’s a 30-minute work in three
movements. Saint-Saรซns, the composer, has such a distinct sound, and violinist
Philippe Quint was the embodiment of it. Quint offered a range of bowing
techniques, from the lightest possible touch on the highest notes, to the
physical collision of the bow coming down and the violin coming up for
heart-wrenching sounds. Both Quint and his 1708 “Ruby” Stradivarius violin were
impressive.

But the RPO was just not with Quint. It’s not that the RPO
is not capable of performing at Quint’s level. The orchestra has certainly
turned out a list of violin concertos both with RPO concertmaster Juliana Athayde, and with others like Augustin Hadelich,
Stefan Jackiw, and Lara St. John. Last night, for
whatever reason, the RPO’s timing on the ends of phrases and entrances was off,
and the orchestra was not anticipating Quint’s phrasing, including his
crescendo with accelerando. To circle again to the imagery of Paris,
Quint’s interpretation in certain lines and passages was the quickening of the
French footfall upon seeing a friend across the way and being happy to greet
them, as opposed to the Rochester
manner in which we see someone and wave and keep going because the weather
makes us want to get inside.

Just a quick head’s up on the concert schedule. Do not miss
the next RPO concert on February 6 and 8. The concert will feature some
Gershwin and some Ellington, and also, Joseph Schwantner’s
“New Morning for the World – Daybreak of Freedom,” which includes text from Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. It’s the only February RPO concert.

The Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra will perform the
program again on Saturday, February 1, 8 p.m. at Kodak Hall at Eastman Theatre,
60 Gibbs St. $15-$82. 454-2100, RPO.org.

One reply on “Concert Review: Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra “An Evening in Paris””

  1. I just heard the concert tonight (Saturday). I do not agree with the above review, Especially regarding the performance of the Violin Concerto. I have performed this concerto many times. Quint’s phrasing was odd and uncomfortable to listen to. His playing was not in the Romantic style. I regret to say that although his playing was extremely virtuosic, it was at the same time rather messy. I was so looking forward to hearing the Saint-Saens, but I was disappointed with his rendition. He had many intonation issues and his tempos were all over the place. The slow sections in the first movement were too slow and the slow movement was too fast as were the slow sections in the third movement. Also, Quint sped up and slowed down in places that were inappropriate. That is why neither the orchestra nor the conductor could follow him exactly all of the time. On the contrary, I thought that the RPO did a wonderful job with both pieces on the first half! Unfortunately, I could not stay for the second half.

Comments are closed.