Send comments to themail@rochester-citynews.com, or post them on our website, rochestercitynewspaper.com, our Facebook page, or our Twitter feed, @roccitynews. Those of fewer than 350 words have a greater chance of being published, and we do edit selections for publication in print. We don’t publish comments sent to other media.

[This post was updated on May 1 to clarify facts of a letter.]

Guns’ threat to women

We are again shaken by a shooting in a school, this time in San Bernardino, the result of a domestic situation.

However, we should not be surprised; this happens daily in America, where more than 10,000 women in these same situations are shot and killed every year. Nor should there be any surprise that children were also killed by the abuser; that is sadly common.

When we think of mass shootings, we tend to think of massacres of strangers, as at the Pulse nightclub or in Aurora. Yet most mass shootings have a common thread: violence against women by men with guns. This is the everyday reality of an America with lax gun laws, while the NRA fantasy of shoot-outs in which bad guys are stopped by manly good guys with guns remains a statistical anomaly.

Studies consistently show that American women are 11 times more likely to be killed by guns than those in other developed countries, that most of these murders are committed by domestic partners, and that the mere presence of a gun in the home increases the likelihood of death for an abused woman.

Furthermore, even more women are traumatized by the threat of gun violence. Researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health report that guns are regularly used in non-fatal incidents of domestic violence. A study in 2000 found that “hostile gun displays are often acts of domestic violence directed against women.” The intensity of trauma and instilled fear by direct and men’s indirect threats of gun violence toward women should not be underestimated.

There is hope. Our New York state legislators can act on current proposals to stem this level of violence against women. One proposal is the Emergency Restraining Protection Order, a proactive process to remove access to guns from those in crisis, including those involved in domestic disputes who are in danger of harming others. This legislation would help fill loopholes in existing law, which only allows for reactive processes that often result in tragic results before they can prevent violence toward women. Provisions for judicial oversight and minimum standards are included, making it constitutionally sound.

As with any common-sense gun violence prevention, it will not stop all gun violence against women. But it is a step in the right direction.

GARY PUDUP

Editor’s note: We failed to do adequate fact-checking on Pudup’s letter prior to publication. As some readers note below, the accurate total of women killed by gun violence during a year is approximately 3000, not 10,000.

A new home for Colgate Rochester

On the proposal for a building housing Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School near the corner of South Goodman Street and Highland Avenue, a location the school’s trustees argue would give it important visibility:

I find the “visibility” rationale puzzling at best. The viability or marketing- recruitment strategy of the divinity school does not hinge on drive-by visibility. Students do not enroll because they happen to see the seminary from the road and think, “Hey, that would be a good place to study.”

There are existing buildings at the top of the hill that could be repurposed or even rebuilt, much closer to the chapel and other facilities that CRCDS would like to maintain access to.

I am a little troubled by the lack of specificity of what Giardino [developer Top Capital official Lou Giardino] calls “compatible use” on the first floor.

And finally, CRCDS will be a tenant. How long will its lease agreement be? What “compatible use” would be found for a new, three-story building in the middle of a wholly residential neighborhood adjacent to Highland Park? Is that the real reason we need a 130-space parking lot?

Bottom line: after sitting through the Top Capital presentation and hearing what the neighbors asked and commented on, my strong hunch is that if CDS agreed to remain at the top of the hill instead of building a new three-story building – totally inconsistent with the rest of the neighborhood – the opposition would vanish.

CHRIS ORR CHRISTOPHER

The arts’ role in fighting poverty

Mary Anna Towler’s recent Urban Journal (“We’re Not Making a Dent in Our High Poverty Rate”) couples support for the arts, unemployment rates, and residents’ actual physical health in a single breath – interesting, because many successful inner-city revitalization efforts have centered around a community-based performing arts center, yet the arts go unmentioned in the Rochester-Monroe Anti-Poverty Initiative.

But not unaddressed.

The two-year-old Joseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance has worked diligently to bring music, dance, and theater education and performance to Rochester’s inner city – with noted success.

As co-sponsor or initiator, we partnered with the City of Rochester to bring the RPO String Ensemble to an outdoor concert last summer on the corner of Joseph and Clifford Avenues (with a planned repeat this summer); featured the Garth Fagan Youth Dance Ensemble and the Rochester Latino Theater Company in outdoor performances; worked with students from the Eastman School of Music to bring performance to libraries and after-school programs; worked with the Memorial Art Gallery to bring inner-city residents to the museum: the list goes on.

Concurrently, we strive to renovate a landmark building on Joseph Avenue – now listed on the National Register of Historic Places – into a 280-seat performing arts space with a community center focus (www.JosephAveArts.org), and we are seeking a committed developer to work with us.

While the anti-poverty initiative addresses a number of important poverty contributors, the effort thus far has ignored a demonstrated major impetus to area re-vitalization: the arts. However, from within Rochester’s poverty-laden inner city, there is hope for the sentinel performing arts center around which revitalization can occur.

NEIL R. SCHEIER

Scheier is president of the Joseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance.

7 replies on “Feedback 4/26”

  1. Arts and poverty. Instead of just talking about bringing performances to certain people in certain areas, how about free dance lessons or drama/acting lessons? How about some on the job training internships in arts management? How about jobs, both in the construction and long term operation of the performing arts center?

  2. Gary P – You’re kind of all over the place with your ranting, but I’ll just say do 5 seconds of research on google before you drop some nonsense like 10k+ women are murdered by guns every year. That’s not even close.

    https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/…

    Secondly, I’m looking at this UN map of the female per capita homicide rate, and we’re in the same category as every civilized (non former USSR) country in Europe.

    https://www.unodc.org/documents/gsh/maps/M…

    Thirdly, when you have time, try reading a real study. It might open your eyes to actual facts, or not. It’s a choice to be educated by reality, or to just stick to political talking points.

    https://www.unodc.org/documents/gsh/pdfs/2…

  3. More on Gary P’s letter — data I found are a bit different than Eric’s, but the conclusion is the same. There are nowhere near 10,000 women murdered by guns each year. This study says 4,816 per year on average from 2012 to 2014:

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/595992…

    It also shows that the number of men murdered per year is 28,783, about 6 times the number of women.

    There is no doubt that the murder rate from firearms is way higher than it should be in the US, compared to other countries. But to say that women are somehow disproportionately affected by this scourge, compared to males, is clearly not true.

  4. Rochester Musician – You’re actually reading your link incorrectly. Your link is “Annual number of gun deaths”. That number includes suicides by firearms, which actually has a higher total than homicides by firearms. It’s the stat the anti-gun crowd chooses to use when trying to make their argument. It’s a bigger/scarier looking number than the actual ~8.5k homicides per year by firearms.

    https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/…

  5. Eric, you’re right, and I stand corrected. The number of gun deaths does not equal the number of gun homicides. It still supports your basic point that I agree with, that there’s no evidence that gun violence disproportionately affects women. All evidence is that men are much more likely to be killed by firearms than women.

  6. Regarding my piece on women and fear, I have been away so please excuse the delay. I stand corrected on the number of women killed each year, my error and my responsibility. I should have been more diligent in checking my sources, that is mine to own.

    However, whether the number is 1,000 or 3,000 or 10,000 it does not change the fact that women are disproportionality the victims in domestic violence situations and that in America they are murdered by gunfire at rates far greater than in other developed countries. I hope no one misses the point that women in these situations have a fact based fear of being gunned down as the woman was in San Bernardino. If anyone remains in doubt I might suggest a face to face with some of them, I spent 30 years dealing with domestic violence as a police officer and have witnessed the consequences first hand, if someone interprets relating those experiences as rants, so be it. I take responsibility for the incorrect number…and for speaking out about this issue.

    I agree with expert sociologist Gavin de Becker who so summed it up perfectly, At core, men are afraid women will laugh at them, while at core, women are afraid men will kill them.
    The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That Protect Us from Violence

Comments are closed.