In the first six months of 2014, Germany got more than one-third of its electricity from renewable sources, according to a new report.

The country’s solar power production was 28 percent higher over that time than it was during the same period in 2013, says a report from theย Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, a German research organization. Its wind power production was 19 percent higher.

Aย brief summary of the reportย on Yale Environment 360 says that on a couple of sunny and windy days in May and June, renewable energy sources generated 50 percent toย 75 percent of Germany’s electricity supply. Theย reportย also shows that Germany’s solar power capacity exceeds generationย capacity from any other source.ย 

American renewable-power advocates often talk up Germany’s successes in boosting renewable energy production. They see the country as proof that the United States could boost domestic renewables.

But Germany, too, continues to rely on fossil fuels. Coal-fired plants are still the country’s primary electricity source, though the amountย of electricity that Germany got from coal was slightly lower in the first half of 2014 than it was in the first half of 2013, the report says.

ย 

ย 

Covers county government and whatever else comes my way. Greyhound dad; vegetarian; attempted photographer with a love for film and fixer; sometimes cyclist.

3 replies on “Germany gains in renewables”

  1. Imagine New York State today if, instead of being bullied by Fracking starting six years ago, we had focused on renewables.

    The great tragedy of this six-year Fracking debacle in New York State is that it has stolen everyoneโ€™s attention from the real problemโ€”energy and Climate Change. Thereโ€™s a great danger that humanityโ€™s inability to see the big picture and only focus on the political and economic fights stirred up by the self-interests of a few will render our life support system null and void.

    For those who are hell bent on hammering the present need and existence of fossil fuels, no one thinks that the transformation from fossil fuels to renewables can be done immediatelyโ€”itโ€™s a change of direction we need, from a energy source that does destroy our environment to one that doesnโ€™t. The quicker the better.

    More on Energy in our area: http://www.rochesterenvironment.com/energy…

  2. Our inaction and political paralysis has brought us to the brink of catastrophic climate change. Instead of rebuilding our transit and energy infrastructures we now have a outdated railroad system used increasingly for Bakken oil ‘bomb’ trains transporting volatile fossil deluent destined for export abroad. Meanwhile Asian and European economies outperform and out-compete us economically and continue to build their new high-speed rail and renewable energy infrastructures. The US has become ‘exceptional’ only in its spectacular failures.

  3. The results of Germany’s move to renewable sourcing of electricity is much more complex than the author would have one think. Similar for Japan’s efforts to shut down nuclear power plants. The cost of generating electricity from renewable sources is considerably higher, and in an effort not to lose jobs due to the move, companies are being exempted from the surcharges, so even more is paid by consumers. Somehow, one does not hear about that. Attached is a link to a NYt article that does a fair job of explaining what is going on.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/19/world/europe/germanys-effort-at-clean-energy-proves-complex.html?pagewanted=all&module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Ar%2C%7B%222%22%3A%22RI%3A16%22%2C%221%22%3A%22RI%3A7%22%7D

Comments are closed.