Public libraries are champions of books and defenders of your freedom to read. They provide a wide variety of reading materials and access for all. It’s an important role, because a free society depends on freedom to read to ensure universal access to information, new ideas, different opinions, learning through books, and knowledge. These activities are protected by the US Constitution.
But the freedom to read through your public library could be in jeopardy.
Several major publishers have refused to sell or license e-books to public libraries. Some make e-books available at very high prices or impose heavy restrictions on their use. Those obstacles severely limit library e-book selections – particularly the most popular books – and make it inconvenient for people to get e-books through their library. The projected growth of e-books over the next five years could transform that inconvenience into an encroachment on your freedom to read.
E-books are here to stay. A recent PricewaterhouseCoopers report projects that by the year 2016, e-books will make up 50 percent of the US trade-book market, and spending on printed books will be limited. A study by the Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project found that 20 percent of adults had read an e-book over the past year. And libraries are already responding to the trend, with 76 percent offering e-books as part of their collections and 39 percent lending e-readers.
It is possible that in the not-too-distant future, new books may only be published in digital format. When that happens, those with an e-book reader, a credit card, and disposable income will have the most freedom to read – creating a deeper-than-ever digital divide and, even worse, a significant knowledge divide.
And that would be far more than an inconvenience.
Just as libraries have reinvented themselves over the years to adjust to dramatic changes in research needs, reading habits, and lending practices, traditional book publishers must reinvent their business models and their relationships with libraries to meet their bottom lines while continuing to support broad access.
Librarians and library organizations across the country are drawing attention to the challenges of e-book access and trying to get publishers to change their practices. Right now, there are discussions and pilots underway between some publishers and some libraries to develop mutually acceptable models for e-book library lending. These discussions will be productive only if they lead to broad action to make e-books available to all libraries for use by the reading public with no strings attached.
But libraries and librarians can’t resolve this important universal access issue alone. They need readers, stakeholders, and policy makers to voice their concerns about the importance of preserving the freedom to read despite changes in what books look like today. The basic right to read hasn’t changed – only the vehicle for delivering books to anyone and everyone seeking information, opinions, knowledge, and the pure joy of sitting down with a good book.
You can support this effort by reaching out to community stakeholders, local and state elected officials, and your members of Congress to make them aware of the e-book lending challenge and to get their support for preserving universal freedom to read and for encouraging committed collaboration between libraries and publishers.
Because your freedom to read is worth fighting for.
Uttaro is director of the Rochester Public Library, Monroe County Library System.
Related Stories
This article appears in Nov 7-13, 2012.
Baloney ! Refusal by publishers to offer certain books to libraries in e-book format is no more an abridgment of one’s right/freedom to read than is the fact publishers regularly discontinue producing certain books thereby ceasing to offer them to libraries.
Let those in the public that want to use e-books do so on their own dime. And let libraries stick to providing access to books made of paper and ink. Perhaps in that way a sufficient demand for REAL books can be maintained so as to persuade publishers to stick with the printed word and leave the electronic toys to the kiddies.
E-books are wonderful and libraries should provide them to lend. The lending terms should be as close as practical to the printed material they are replacing.
I wonder if Chaim DeLoye might have heard about another great stand to prevent the electronic toys and the kiddies from ruining a market: After all there will always be room at the top for top flight camera film, no matter what.
That worked so well with Kodak. Let’s try to avoid letting similar things happen to public libraries. Like or dislike new media – that’s your choice, and I wouldn’t try to deny you the freedom to make that choice. By pigeonholing ebooks and readers as “electronic toys,” I believe that you’ve set yourself up for failure by refusing to even look at the issues involved – in favor of trying to turn back the tide to maintain demand for “REAL” books.
When a large fraction of book sales are being made of mass market or trade paperback volumes, printed on shoddy paper, with poor ink, and worse glues – just what intrinsic benefit is there to that format over an electronic file in a format that may become obsolete, but has the chance to avoid physical degradation through backing up the file?