I stew so often in this space about education problems that
it’s good to be able to focus on more positive news.

In a unique partnership with the Rochester school district,
the UR is about to take charge of East High School, which prevents the school
from being closed due to its poor academic record. And I’m encouraged by
comments that Steve Uebbing, the University of
Rochester professor leading the East reform efforts, made in a recent interview
with City’s Tim Macaluso
.

Rochester has had failing schools before, and it has
launched several reforms to turn them around. But nothing has worked. Now East
is under the UR’s wing.

I’m not naïve about East’s chances; East is failing because
so many of its students are failing. And they didn’t arrive at East
academically up to speed. They had been falling behind for years. I don’t know
how much success teachers can have intervening this late in the students’
education.

But if Uebbing and the East staff
pull this off, we’ll learn a lot. Best I can tell, the
UR was tough in the negotiations about its involvement, insisting, for
instance, that it be able to hire all of the staff. Maybe this staff can do
what others haven’t been able to.

Gratifyingly, there were far more applicants for positions
at East than jobs. The majority of teacher applicants, Uebbing
said, were “very competent and confident.” Eighty of the 195 teaching positions
went to current East teachers.

And Uebbing had words that I hope
critics of teachers will take to heart: “We don’t blame teachers or anybody for
the current situation. We do blame longstanding systematic, social, and
economic issues.”

While a school “can’t fix all that stuff,” he added, it can
work on “education and social-emotional issues.”

Significantly, Uebbing said he asked
state education officials to point to “exemplar” models of school turnarounds.
The officials didn’t have any. “Then,” he said, “I asked them for a list of
schools that had at least 75 percent graduation rate and at least 75 percent
free and reduced lunch rate that were urban schools.”

The state officials managed to come up with one.

That’s the reality of urban education.

This is a grand experiment, the latest among many in our
quest to provide a strong education in a high-poverty school district. In the
past, we’ve blamed the usual people for our lack of success: teachers,
principals, school boards, superintendents, the
Central Office bureaucracy. But placing blame is easy. Documenting cause and
effect is hard.

I hope the UR turnaround initiative will succeed. And if it
does, or if, in spite of everybody’s hopes, East’s academic record doesn’t
improve dramatically, I hope the UR will tell us why and put us on the path to
real reform.

‘City cousins’

“Appalling” barely begins to describe the attitude of
Henrietta Supervisor Jack Moore.

Caught on tape during what he thought was a private
conversation with a Town of Henrietta employee, Moore jokes about the
employee’s “city cousins.”

The Affordable Care Act, Moore says, is “how we’re going to
pay for your cousins in the city.” And then: “You don’t know about city
cousins?” he says, laughing. “We get all kinds of them. They bus them out here,
OK?”

Asked if a black man walking nearby is one of the “city
cousins,” Moore says, “Yes, that’s one of your cousins.”

Moore has insisted that there was no racist intent in his
comments. He “misspoke,” he told the Democrat and Chronicle. He “made a big
mistake.” And he has since taken “sensitivity training.” But as City’s Jeremy
Moule noted
after the news broke, Moore’s problem isn’t insensitivity, it’s disrespect.

The Henrietta news comes at a time when there are
community-wide efforts to combat racism. But we still have a very long way to
go. And Jack Moore just showed us how big our job is.

Mary Anna Towler is a transplant from the Southern Appalachians and is editor, co-publisher, and co-founder of City. She is happy to have converted a shy but opinionated childhood into an adult job. She...

4 replies on “Our school-reform quest”

  1. “And Uebbing had words that I hope critics of teachers will take to heart: “We don’t blame teachers or anybody for the current situation. We do blame longstanding systematic, social, and economic issues.”

    That said, how will those longstanding systematic, social and economic issues be addressed? I doubt if they will be addressed; too complicated and controversial.

    If they “pull this off”, and I believe they will, they will learn that cherry picking teachers, administrators, students and families who bought in by signing agreements of commitment, along with limiting class sizes will bring optimal results.
    Then the question will be how to replicate what happened at East, in all city schools?

  2. Agree in large part with Don. The U of R simply got what most others have been not been able to. The difference is that the U of R, because it is an EPO can get these things without the formal approval of the same leaders who have been holding down innovation and common sense for years. In fact the U of R is implementing many basic methods used in successful charter schools. Weeks of summer preparation, a longer day, a clear and strict student code of conduct policy, giving preference to neighborhood kids, smaller classes, more specialists, etc. But the big one is that they got to select the staff and they are requiring that staff sign onto their vision. If you aren’t on board, then jump ship.

    These same practices could and should be implemented in all RCSD schools but they never will be. RCSD leaders can’t endorse this level of autonomy on a large scale. That would mean surrendering their control and it would be unthinkable to have schools filled with people willing to tell those in charge that they are not needed.

  3. Does anyone else find it mildly alarming that the U of R (a research institution) is asking NYS for a list of schools with 75% free and reduced lunch and 75% graduation rate? Such a combination is hardly unheard of in the state, and can be readily gleaned from the data available on NYSED’s website. Something is fishy about this tale. I sure hope this partnership is not starting off with an effort to lower expectations already.

  4. I must agree with Don & Gotta Say It. UofR will likely be successful in this venture because they will be able to do things the district would never be able (or willing) to do. Reducing enrollment, reducing class size, hand selecting teachers and students. They got an extra $10 million from RCSD as well – for ONE school. East has failed miserably under the current principal, Anibal Soler, and guess what – he’s back!! I wonder if he’s a former (or current) UofR student???

Comments are closed.