Both Democrats and Republicans in Monroe County have offices on the ballot in the September primary elections – which are on a Thursday this year, because of the Jewish holiday. But the vast majority are in the Democratic Party, for elected positions affecting residents of the City of Rochester.
In New York, voters have to be registered in a particular party in order to vote in that party’s primary. And for this year’s primary, it’s too late to register: the deadline for in-person registration was August 14; for mail-in, August 15.
Our endorsements in some key races follow. Next week: profiles of many of the candidates.
Rochester school board
Any year in the Rochester school district is a critical year. Multiple challenges in the city’s high-poverty schools have resulted in decades of low student achievement. That is a tragedy for the children and their families. And it is a tragedy for the metropolitan area, which could benefit immensely if Rochester students’ potential were realized.
Next year will be a particularly important one for the district, however. The school board members who take office in January will have to make one of the most important decisions any board makes: who will lead the district as superintendent. Superintendent Bolgen Vargas’s contract expires in June 2016, and given the disagreements between him and the board, his future in the district isn’t guaranteed. One of the first things the board will do in the new year will be grappling with that issue.
The people of the Rochester school district – the superintendent and other administrators, the staff, and the school board – have been the target of public hostility and distrust for years, often unfairly, for matters well beyond their control. That’s certainly been the case for the current board. But this is a particularly strong board, and while there continue to be divisions – including over the issue of the superintendent’s future – the board has worked well together, despite strong personalities and diverse opinions.
We are concerned about the board’s tendency to get involved in matters that clearly should be handled by the superintendent – insisting on being able to oversee some of his senior administrators, for instance. That will continue to cause conflict with the current superintendent and his staff, and if Vargas’s contract isn’t renewed, the conflict and the perception that board members want to micromanage will hurt their ability to attract a strong, competent person.
That said, Rochester is fortunate to have this many smart people willing to take on what is often a thankless, extremely difficult public-service job.
Three of the four incumbents whose terms expire this year are seeking re-election: Mary Adams, Malik Evans, and Willa Powell. We are endorsing all three, plus newcomer Liz Hallmark. All four are exceptionally capable Rochesterians.
Mary Adams is completing her first four-year term on the school board. A research nurse in the Aids Clinic at the University of Rochester Medical Center, the detail-oriented Adams chairs the school board’s audit committee. She is knowledgeable about the challenges facing disadvantaged Rochesterians and is deeply empathetic, and she is heavily involved in the community outside of her career and board responsibilities.
Malik Evans, who is completing his third term on the board, is an experienced, likable board member who was board president from 2008 through 2013. He has a broad knowledge of the school district, urban education, and the city, and, like Adams, he is heavily involved in community work, serving on key boards and initiatives. Elected in 2003 as the youngest board member in the district’s history, Evans has become not only an eloquent spokesperson for the district and its students’ needs but also a seasoned, effective politician.
Liz Hallmark ran unsuccessfully for school board in 2013, and there is a noticeable difference in maturity as a candidate now. She has used those two years diligently to understand the school district, the needs of students and teachers, and the board’s role. She has the potential to be a strong, knowledgeable board member at an important time.
Willa Powell is the only one of the three incumbents seeking re-election who was not endorsed by her party, and she can be off-putting, a bit school-marmish in temperament. But she has incredible strengths, which you’re apt to see more in one-on-one discussions. She is a director of the “Big 5” conference of school boards, which represents most of the state’s largest urban districts. She is knowledgeable not only about the challenges of the Rochester district but also about state education issues and the state’s relationship to urban school boards and school district governance.
As for the candidates we’re not endorsing: All four are people who want to try to improve the lives of Rochester’s children. But none have the strengths that Adams, Evans, Hallmark, and Powell have.
As we do every school board election, we pass over Howard Eagle with great regret. Few people interested in urban education issues could match his understanding of the needs of black American students – or his dedication to meeting those needs and his advocacy on behalf of those students. That advocacy has included concrete action, not just words.
One on one, Eagle is an eloquent advocate. And we join him in his anger, at systemic racism and governmental inaction. But as an elected official, his anger would get in the way of effective action.
Matt McDermott: is knowledgeable, and he’s particularly strong talking about the need to reform the district’s school choice program. But the four candidates we are endorsing have more depth, and their experience is a plus as we head into an important year.
Mia Hodgins has sought election to the school board twice previously. She clearly has a deep concern about children, but she lacks the depth of understanding, both about the district and about the board’s operations, that the four candidates we’re endorsing have.
Lorenzo Williams, a substitute teacher with the Rochester school district, is concerned about improving academic performance – particularly that of male students of color – and helping students develop vocational skills. But he lacks experience and depth of understanding about how a board works and how to effectively change things.
City Council
The four district seats are up on Rochester City Council this year, and there are primaries in every race. The city is facing major challenges right now, including high poverty and a tax base that has been hit by the loss of manufacturing and retail businesses. But the city also has enormous opportunities, with a growing number of technology businesses and the possibilities the photonics institute may offer. In addition, there’s a growing interest – particularly among empty-nesters and young professionals – in urban living.
In meeting those challenges, City Council members serve both as partners of Mayor Lovely Warren and as watchdog. And the district council members also serve the vital role of representing the constituents of their individual sections of the city.
In the four district races, we’re endorsing three candidates.
East District: Elaine Spaull. Spaull, who is running for her third term on Council, is executive director of the Center for Youth. She seems to be everywhere and is very knowledgeable about the challenges in her district and in the city. She’s also responsive, and extremely energetic.
Challenger Lisa Jacques, the owner of Park Ave. Pets, is facing tough odds in this race against a popular incumbent. Jacques is eloquent in her concerns about corporate welfare and the city’s nuisance-points system, and as a small-business owner, she has been active on issues related to neighborhood retailers for several years. But Spaull is a dynamic, intelligent, committed representative. You’d have to make a compelling case to unseat her, and Jacques hasn’t done that.
In addition, Jacques’ positions are sometimes naïve. For example, her assertion that Council knowingly passes unconstitutional laws to reap the benefit while the inevitable lawsuits play out is far-fetched.
South District: Adam McFadden. McFadden is being challenged by Ann Lewis, an earnest candidate who says McFadden isn’t as approachable or responsive as he should be. But she’s not well known. And although it seems like Lewis would make a decent, honest representative, she’s green, and it’s difficult to make a case for losing the knowledge and experience that McFadden has gained from his years working in city government and the nonprofit community.
McFadden was caught up in the Rochester Housing Authority scandal when he became RHA’s interim and possible permanent head, then lost that job after a HUD ruling. He says he was treated unfairly. Regardless, he has continued to serve as a vocal, eloquent advocate for his district and its needs.
He is a provocateur and sometimes seems to speak without having all the facts. But he’s also frank and much more knowledgeable and engaged than some people give him credit for. And he speaks out passionately on behalf of the most disadvantaged residents of the city.
Northwest District: Molly Clifford. Clifford, who has a long history in city government and Democratic politics, is being challenged by LaShana Boose, an adjunct faculty member at Monroe Community College, for this open seat. Incumbent Carla Palumbo is not seeking re-election.
Boose’s campaign did not follow through on requests to set up an interview with the candidate.
Clifford is sometimes knocked because she’s held several different jobs with the city, but she has been impressive in those posts. She knows the city, she certainly knows politics, and she’s a worker. And given her background, she would need very little time to get up to speed on Council.
Clifford also sees the bigger picture in the northwest. MCC’s Damon Campus is moving into the quadrant, and Eastman Business Park is there, and Clifford sees opportunity in possible partnerships. That’s the progressive thinking that the city needs.
Northeast District: No endorsement. In this primary, incumbent Mike Patterson is running against Eugenio Cotto Jr., former executive director of the Group 14621 Community Association.
Patterson did not respond to a request for an interview, and has never spoken with City. Patterson does seem engaged on Council and asks pertinent questions. Cotto is enthusiastic, and he certainly knows the 14621 neighborhood. He talks a lot about the need for investment in the northeast quadrant and the need to attack issues systemically based on a well-considered plan. But he seems better suited for working directly with residents at the street level than as an elected official.
County Legislature
Democrats have been in the Monroe County Legislature’s minority since the 1990’s, and none of this year’s primaries are going to tip that balance.
The GOP majority generally blocks Democratic legislation; the number of caucus proposals that have passed in the past decade can be counted on one hand. But there are plenty of issues the legislature needs to address, from social services funding to the consecutive administrations’ use of local development corporations to outsource some operations.
And over the years, the caucus has taken on the roles of watchdog, inquisitor, foil, and advocate. The members have held up bonding for projects where they see too many unresolved logistical or funding issues, and they’ve made a righteous fuss about county spending on child-care subsidies.
Whoever emerges as the victor in each of the four Democratic primaries, barring some big gains during the November general election, will have a role in those efforts.
One race is particularly crucial, and that’s the 28th District contest between endorsed candidate Cynthia Kaleh and challenger Ricky Frazier. Kaleh has served in the legislature for eight years, has a great deal of knowledge about how the legislature works, has a genuine desire to find common ground with her Republican colleagues, and has been a passionate advocate for restoring child-care subsidy cuts.
Frazier has depth, and he has some good ideas, particularly vout gearing local economic development incentives towards start-ups and emerging tech businesses. The next county executive and legislature should follow through on his suggestion to hold town hall meetings where people can meet with officials to voice concerns or learn about civil service job opportunities. But Kaleh’s experience and her deep connections to neighborhood groups in the district make her the better choice.
City is also endorsing Mark Muoio, who’s running in the 21st District against challenger Bobbi Mitchell. Muoio’s background as an attorney working on housing issues will be very valuable in the legislature. He already has some thoughts about how small changes in county policies could prevent some unnecessary evictions. He’s also interested in finding ways for the county to better address hazards in subsidized housing.
As for Mitchell, City was unable to find even basic information about her campaign or platform or a way to contact her. Constituents should be able to easily contact their representatives and those seeking to represent them.
We are not making endorsements in the two remaining legislature Democratic primaries.
In the 23rd District, former Rochester police chief James Sheppard faces a challenge from city Buildings and Parks Director Mitch Rowe, who has a vast amount of political and administrative experience. Both candidates are outstanding, and either would be a good fit in the legislature. Sheppard brings experience working with troubled youth and wants to be an advocate for working families. And Rowe believes he can help the caucus continue to be effective an effective budget watchdog.
The 29th District covers one of the poorest parts of the county. Ernest Flagler, a city firefighter and the incumbent legislator, faces a challenge from Leslie Rivera, an East High School vice principal. The district covers one of the poorest parts of Monroe County, and both candidates are passionate about improving the lives of people in the district. Both are also heavily involved in various community groups, programs, and events, and each would be good representatives of this district in the legislature.
This article appears in Aug 26 – Sep 1, 2015.














I’m disappointed by the school board endorsements. How can City Newspaper continue to talk out of both sides of their mouth? Your newspaper has claimed to be discouraged by the current board and their lack of results for RCSD youth, but continue to endorse the same people you have scolded and claim you don’t trust and who don’t serve our children!?
As for not endorsing me for my lack of knowledge, I will not have the experience and depth of knowledge of anyone who is a current board member. Experience and knowledge comes with time on the job. I will especially not have the depth of knowledge that comes from Willa Powell, a member of the School Board for 16 years; 16 dismal years. That reason for your not endorsing me is weak.
You are perpetuating the cycle of insanity when it comes to the Rochester City School Board; doing the same thing, but expecting different results. I am deeply disappointed with you City.
~Mia Hodgins
Rochester City School Board Candidate
“One on one, Eagle is an eloquent advocate. And we join him in his anger, at systemic racism and governmental inaction. But as an elected official, his anger would get in the way of effective action.”
======================================
I am very disappointed the City News has once again judged and disciplined Professor Howard Eagle in an election. How do you know that “his anger would get in the way of effective action”?
Perhaps we need more debate and not less debate on the School Board. If talk is cheap, why not more of it when it comes to our students?
I recommend a book to you: “Thank You for Arguing” by Jay Heinrichs, and his blog:
http://www.ArgueLab.com
East District: Elaine Spaull and Northwest District: Molly Clifford are outstanding representatives of the people!
This article makes the same error of clarity that the Monroe County Board of Elections website does: August 14 is the deadline to change your registration ADDRESS (or register to vote for the first time), NOT your party affiliation. This seems to be a distinction that is common knowledge to the bureaucrats and partisans at the Board of Elections, and, apparently, weekly newspaper editors. I would assume most people, like myself, wouldn’t know that distinction.
I was frustrated and disappointed to learn on August 14, when I presented myself in person at the Board of Elections, that party affiliations are only updated once a year and the deadline had long passed to be able to do so for the September primaries.
I can only see this arcane rule as a way for the two-party duopoly to maintain their grip on the electoral process. There’s no technical or procedural reason that a new voter registering for the first time on August 14 can be processed by September 10 but someone CHANGING their registration cannot.
Taking a larger view, I see the closed primary system, run by the two main political parties, as a failure of the democratic ideals we claim to hold dear. Most municipalities, with the exception of a few relatively balanced inner suburbs and villages, are one party states: overwhelmingly one party or the other. Therefore the party primaries are the only elections that matter. Therefore, unless you chose to become a member of the dominant party, you are effectively disenfranchised.
FYI, I was informed by the folks at the Board of Elections that October 9 is the deadline to change your party affiliation to be able to vote in the New York State presidential primaries in the spring.
As always, a supposedly “alternate” newspaper endorses the status quo and Establishment candidates to the last. How interesting that not ONE challenger was endorsed by this “alternate” and “progressive” weekly. Perhaps because this publication has been the Establishment of the liberal affluent elite in this community for at least the last 20 years. A truly progressive and alternative idea hasn’t been given serious consideration in these pages in a long time. Instead it is the closed minded, “my-way-is-the-only-way” liberalism that has characterized the local Democratic establishment in this community for years. And I would be considered by most people to be a very liberal Democrat.
WHAT ELSE WOULD WE EXPECT FROM CITY NEWSPAPER???
My 2015 School Board Campaign Platform:
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the seven (7) point platform below represents an objectively correct, and clear direction for our children and families. Therefore, the focus of my campaign, and contribution toward helping improve educational conditions for all children in the Rochester City School District (RCSD) — will revolve around the following issues:
1. Establishing relevant, broad-based, parent, student and community engagement at every level of the system, and throughout the community (movement)
2. Addressing / ending systemic, social promotion
3. Development / Implementation of effective, authentic, alternative educational models
4. Systemic change regarding standardization (in order to produce a new reality, in which the overall, initial focus is on properly and adequately laying the academic foundation upon which all else is built)
5. Addressing / reducing systemic / institutionalized racism, and establishing cultural equity
6. Working for relief from federal and state mandates (increased autonomy, and local / community control)
7. Reducing / mitigating the impact and effects of concentrated, widespread poverty (equitable resource acquisition and efficiency, which includes rooting out massive waste, and possibly fiscal mismanagement, malfeasance and corruption)
Rationale: As it relates to focus and contribution — if I am elected — I will continue doing what I have been doing for over 35 years, which is working collaboratively and cooperatively with parents, grandparents, guardians, students, other family members, committed educators, Board members, and anyone else who is serious about widespread change and improvement within the RCSD — in the process of building an ongoing movement, which I am thoroughly convinced will be necessary in order to produce substantial change and improvement. As a Board member, I would be better positioned to help build such a movement. Of course, any credible movement must necessarily center around concrete issues and conditions that are negatively impacting our children and families. Those include, but are not limited to the following:
I will work to help ensure that we get focused (with laser-like precision) on the foundational academic development of our children — by doing everything that we possibly can to make certain that they master literacy skills and knowledge — that is, reading, writing, math skills and knowledge at or above grade level (right from the very beginning), which is one of the most important reasons why we must address / change the standardized testing process, i.e., because it is driving everything that happens at the classroom level, and deprives teachers and support staff of the necessary time and energy to concentrate on developing foundational skills and knowledge. Instead, largely because of state and federal mandates, rules, regulations and policies — teachers find themselves (more and more) teaching narrowly to tests. There is no mystery surrounding the reason why so many of our children don’t do well on tests. It’s because they don’t have adequate reading, writing, and math skills, which again represents the very foundation of all knowledge, and which is necessary for them to be able to master higher-order knowledge and skills — such as critical and analytical reading, writing and thinking. So, I’m saying, if we lay the foundation properly, then we won’t have to worry so much about tests. If the proper foundation has been laid, then the testing issue will take care of itself (as long as that which is being tested, is fundamentally the same as that which is being taught). So there are two issues wrapped up together: 1) the need for more local control (as opposed to far too many dictates from the state and federal governments, and 2) the need to free teachers and support staff up — so that they will have the time and energy to focus, again, with laser-like precision, on laying the academic foundation upon which all knowledge and skills-development is built. This issue is even more important when we consider that huge numbers of our children enter the system lagging far behind their middle class peers — right from the very beginning.
The latter referenced issue is clearly among the most important of all issues we face, and is connected to another issue, i.e., the issue of widespread, concentrated poverty. Please don’t misunderstand me regarding this critically important issue. I do not subscribe (under any circumstances) to any theory or idea about children not being able to learn because they live in poverty. If this was the case, many whom I’ve known (as children of migrant farm workers) would be among the most uneducated people on earth. On the other hand, for us to stick our heads in the sand (as an ostrich would do), and pretend that issues and conditions that often come along with abject poverty —does not impact our ability to educate well — is frankly ridiculous, but the main point is that we need to do all we can to make sure we have the necessary, equitable, resources to provide whatever our children need in order to develop to their full potentials, which is currently not the case, and to be honest, in order to secure such necessary resources probably will require a struggle and a fight (politically speaking). As you probably know, often those who need less — actually get more — because they are well organized and very effective advocates for their children (often exclusively). The other side of this coin is, we must make sure the vast amount of resources that we do receive (nearly $800 million dollars) are being utilized efficiently and effectively, which obviously is not the case currently, and which raises another issue, which I would be better positioned to help focus on as a Board member, i.e., rooting out massive waste, and possibly fiscal mismanagement, malfeasance and corruption, which is currently occurring in the RCSD.
Two other critically important issues, which we must deal with are 1) the need to address individual and institutionalized / systemic racism and the establishment of cultural equity relative to curricula, hiring and retention practices, as well as other ways, including revisiting a number of existing policies and practices. I realize this is a sensitive issue, but it is one that we cannot shy away from. It needs to be addressed; 2) it is amply clear that traditional educational approaches and systems will not work for many of our students, especially many of those who have been shuffled through the system via the criminal practice of social (age) promotion. Therefore, we must get serious about developing authentic, alternative models of education.
These (above) represent areas that I have focused on as a community activist, for over 35 years, and will continue to focus on as a Board member.
Also, I would like to be clear about the fact that I do not view myself as, and I am not presenting myself as some sort of superman. On the contrary, in my humble, but staunch view, probably not much of this will get done unless and until we build a deadly serious, ongoing, movement of parents, grandparents, guardians, students, extraordinarily committed educators, politicians, including and especially Board members, and anyone else who is really serious about widespread, fundamental change and improvement — working cooperatively, collaboratively and constantly around concrete, well defined, measurable goals strategies and tactics, which is in essence what a movement is.
I hope that Prof. Howard Eagle will win a seat on the Rochester Board of Education. In order to do so, I suggest that he focus on simple actions and statements that people can easily grasp.
We all have our “wishlists” but then the question is HOW. Perhaps HOWard Eagle can help the Rochester schools to take off and fly like an EAGLE.
Here is an example of a 4 minute message for students and teachers, that could be circulated with ease:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH3akqBwYf…
Good luck, Howard Eagle
There was a time when I was quick to dismiss Mr. Eagle in this comment section, and perhaps he and I still disagree on certain issues to an extent, however I’ve come to realize that the man knows his stuff. As for his “anger” getting in the way… hasn’t the time long passed in the RCSD to stop worrying about people’s feelings and start expecting results? It’s time to seriously shake up the district and Mr. Eagle has the passion and knowledge necessary to do just that.
I’ve read Howard Eagles comments over the past few years in multiple publications and have come to the conclusion that this man wants to stir up anger and blame for things that are long sense gone and have nothing to do with anyone around today.