Counting pennies in Brockport
I read with great interest the Op-Ed by Dan Varrenti (“The Brockport Record,” May 5). Both he and Mayor
Jo Matela have opined regarding the lack of
“solutions” being offered by those complaining about village taxes.
I have a
simple solution for the entire problem: Taking a page from the book of Donald
Trump, you’re fired. Both of you. Or whomever would be
determined redundant as a result of combining the governments of Brockport and Sweden
into one town government and contracting with the MonroeCounty sheriff’s department to do
road patrols in the village.
When I
first moved to the village, I was struck by what I refer to as “The State
Street monument to New York
government redundancy.” For anyone who has not visited the town: the
offices of the Village of Brockport and the Town of Sweden are almost directly
across State Street from one another, a symbol of the ongoing shoving match to
see who can extract more property taxes from my wallet.
While Mr. Varrenti and Ms. Matela argue
over saving nickels and dimes, how much could be saved by eliminating one whole
layer of government? Instead of having two distinct DPWs,
each with its own trucks, employees, benefits packages, and storage and
maintenance facilities, why not have one slightly larger one?
How much
cheaper would it be if instead of hiring officers part-time, paying for
facilities, overtime, benefits, etc., we simply extended the sheriff’s-patrol
contract with the rest of Sweden
to cover the village also, perhaps also requiring that one or two cars will
always be in the village?
The
grumbling I hear is from the residents of Brockport who do not happen to stay up
past 11pm and have most likely not
played “beer pong” within the last year. To them I say: first, both
Pittsford and Henrietta locally, and many other towns nationwide with colleges
in them, have the same arrangement and neither is burning to the ground.
Second, why
did you move to the village in the first place? The college is not only
responsible for saving the town so that it exists at all, after the decline of
manufacturing and the canal, but it is also a very good neighbor and employer
to many of you.
The college
does not exist without these students. Since it was here in one form or another
since 1841, it surely predates any currently living resident’s interest in the
area.
I realize
that what I am advocating is a miniature version of the idea that lost Mayor
Johnson the county-executive race, but as he pointed out, doesn’t it at least
deserve a hard look? It’s difficult to look into eliminating your own job, but
if government serves the people, isn’t saving us money in the interest of all?
From my
rather rare lens on the situation (I am currently a Village
of Brockport homeowner, landlord,
voter, and full-time SUNY Brockport student), it is obvious to me that this
idea would save money, streamline local affairs, and go far to integrate all of
the residents of this area into one community.
This of
course means that it will never happen.
Daniel Kuhn, Brockport
UP ON THE BOX
I was just sitting here reading what I thought to be a good
article on the Chesterfield Kings (“I Scene It,” May 5), and I came across the
“Dancing Girls” part, where Frank DeBlase
said we were “strung out” or “lazy.”
Being one
of those “dancing girls” up on that million-degree stage in 7-inch heels
on top of a little black box that wobbled every time you moved — and nothing
to support you other than your words of don’t
fall don’t fall going over and over in your head: this was not the easiest
task I’ve ever done.
Maybe we
should have Mr. DeBlase on stage next time, in the
7-inch heels on the little black wobbling box. And I will be sure to write the
article on how his performance was.
An apology
would be nice.
Sarah McPike, Colonial Road, Rochester
From Frank DeBlase:
Well, once again it’s me and my big mouth. It was a flip remark and I
apologize — mea maxima culpa. I certainly couldn’t have gotten up there and
done what you did. And though I find the idea enticing, walking around in
7-inch high heels would most certainly do me in.
SPULA’S VOICE
I am one of those readers who enjoysCity not just for the progressive
voice it provides, but also because it is not exclusive of more conservative
commentary. Jack Spula championed many causes that
were not popular with a more conservative portion of City’s readership; however, his rebuttals were always kind,
respectful, and informative.
Through his
depth and skill, Jack the writer invited readers into the realm of thought and
reflection with regard to important issues of our day. It was clear that he was
not about dismissing readers who did not agree with him, but more that he
understood where they were possibly mis- or disinformed.
Writing is
a tough job. It helps to have passion for the truth and the facts, although
some might label truth and facts as an agenda. He did his homework, presented
it all in a well crafted accessible format and was prepared to respond to the
inevitable flack. He brought integrity to City.
Maybe a bigger publication with an even broader readership will find Jack.
Heaven knows we need more voices like his, what with half the nation still
believing in Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, connections to Al Qaeda terrorists, and a US
led liberation.
Tom Moore, Arlington Street, Rochester
THE US
IN IRAQ
On August 27, 2003,
the film Battle of Algiers was shown
to Military Special Operations Chiefs at the Pentagon. The lesson of the film
is that for the French in Algeria,
torture, murder, and destruction were effective means of countering terrorism
and insurgency. So now with the United States
in Iraq.
The torture
of prisoners is in fact not an aberration but standard operating procedure for
US forces in Iraq.
The only aberration has been that the American people found out about it.
Our
president has stated that “we will carry death and violence to the four corners
of the earth in defense of this great nation.” This pledge is now being carried
out in Iraq.
Noam Chomsky has said, “We live in a world ruled by force,
and violence works.” The United States
will rule by death and violence in the world.
I believe
this state of affairs will continue unchallenged in the US
because the majority of Americans are not interested in what is happening. The
remainder will believe that the torture and murder of Iraqis is just revenge
for the deaths of Americans killed in Iraq.
Earl W. Blizzard III, Linwood
As veteran of Viet Nam,
I find the prisoner abuse despicable, and Donald Rumsfeld
should take the blame for all actions committed by our troops. At least the
general who was in charge, Karpinski, should resign,
with a lower rank, and there should be Bad Conduct Discharges handed out to any
troops found guilty of these crimes.
This war is
a travesty and these actions, which have all not been uncovered, are a shroud
on the people and Democratic system under which we have operated for over 200
years.
As
veterans, we should speak out against such actions. It is inhumane to treat
others in this capacity. They have not been charged with any crimes. We should
also not be holding anyone unless we have evidence that they are involved in
crimes against humanity.
I feel
twisted inside and want this whole thing to go away. I feel like giving up my
citizenship, but the whole world is now in turmoil, and I can’t run anywhere.
President
Bush tries to pass himself off as a born-again Christian, but I find there are
not many of the Christian faith who preach or act as the peace-loving Christ
and Buddha did.
Thomas Mangialino,
Culver Road, Irondequoit
I was once proud to be an American. I once lived in the
country known for always taking the “high road,” for treating
everyone fairly and humanely and for being the moral leader of the world.
I once
lived in the country that could denounce the atrocities perpetrated upon the
citizens of other countries. Now America
is a perpetrator of these same atrocities.
I am no
longer proud to be an American. I now live in the America
that preemptively goes to war based on lies and exaggerations. I now live in
the America
that abuses prisoners of war. I now live in the America
that is compared with the worst countries of the world instead of the best.
America
cannot wait until the November presidential election to begin to restore the
dignity and honor of this country. As citizens, we must demand the immediate
impeachment of George Bush, and we must demand the removal of his entire
administration from roles of power.
As
Americans we must show the rest of the world that we will not stand behind this
administration. Only then can the US
begin to rebuild its image as the greatest country on Earth.
Thomas R. Janowski, Hazelhurst Drive, Gates
AMERICAN VALUES
Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like your staff has a clear
agenda, and that is to attack all things that a majority of this country, and
indeed a majority of this city, believe in: this country, its values, and its
heritage.
The letters
in your May 12 issue are all of one theme: down with the moral right. What
about the immoral and amoral wrong? No matter how much money and publicity the
minority has been able to muster, most people still hold dear to them the
institution of marriage, its sanctity, and its very definition. Many who oppose
this are very intelligent and resourceful, and therefore able to spread their
viewpoint in the various media. That does not make them right, however.
Civilization owes its existence to laws, both moral and social. God created man
and woman to join together as one and procreate in that manner.
You also
promote an ideology of ignorance and left-wing nonsense that could lead to this
country’s downfall. It is true that some of our troops have acted
inappropriately, and they should be dealt with. However, this war is not about
vengeance. It is about saving our lives. We were attacked on September 11 by
representatives of an ideal that knows no geographical boundaries. The only
thing we can do as a country is seek out those who support this ideology with
money and the sacrifice of life and ensure that they are no longer a threat.
This will
not be accomplished by turning and running home, ignoring the problem, or
pretending it doesn’t exist.
The only
thing that will save American lives is dedication to making the world a safer
place. That is not going to happen with any plan that any left-wing radical has
yet to come up with.
M.B. Davidson, Rochester
TALK TALK
I consider myself a liberal, open-minded person, so I was
surprised that a recent letter, “Wease Talk” (The
Mail, April 28), irritated me so badly. Maybe it’s all of the nonsense over
Janet Jackson, or Howard Stern’s recent departure from Clear Channel’s programming.
The letter
writer says that if he wanted to hear the “kind of junk” that’s on Wease’s program, he would go to an entertainment club. Last
time I checked, radio was also a form of entertainment. He also said that
left-wing shows are too full opinion and lack any facts. As far as I know,
that’s what talk radio is: opinion.
If you want
the facts, listen to the news station. (Even then, what we get is filtered and
selective). I am not saying that all conservatism is wrong, but I am sick of
conservatives complaining about radio, television, etc. I think the problem is
that conservatives are so hell bent on their freedom of speech, bashing anyone
who operates on the fringes of their “code of ethics,” that they forget about
their freedom of choice: the choice to change the channel.
Amanda DeFisher, East Avenue, Rochester
WRITING TO CITY
We welcome and encourage readers’ letters for publication.
Send them to: themail@rochester-citynews.com or The Mail, City Newspaper, 250
North Goodman Street, Rochester14607.
Our
guidelines: We don’t publish anonymous letters — and we ask that you include
your street name and city/town/village. We don’t publish letters that have been
sent to other media. While we don’t restrict length, letters of under 350 words have a greater chance of being published. We
do edit letters for clarity and brevity. And in general we don’t publish
letters (or longer “op-ed” pieces) from the same writer more often than once
every three months.
A CORRECTION
Due to an editing error, an incorrect date was given for a
mural on West Main Street
(“West on Main: Developing a String of Pearls,” May 19).
The mural, from a Franklin Roosevelt presidential campaign, was painted in
1944, of course, not 1994.
This article appears in May 26 – Jun 1, 2004.
