Imagine taking a relaxed, pleasant bike ride on one of Rochester’s moderately busy streets โ coexisting peacefully with cars and enjoying the scenery. But then the lane just ends at an intersection or in a spot where the roadway narrows. Suddenly, you’re forced into the street.
“To the casual observer, you’re riding along and you have accommodation, and then it stops, and it’s hard to understand why that happens,” says Glenn Cerosaletti of Brighton, who bikes roughly 2,000 miles a year, much of it in the City of Rochester. He’s also on the board of the Rochester Cycling Alliance advocacy group.
Fragmented bike lanes are a problem in the city, especially for inexperienced or casual cyclists.
Rochester has installed 41.3 miles of bike lanes and added shared-use markings to 26.1 miles of driving lanes over the last five years. The city also rolled out bicycle boulevards: marked routes that parallel high-traffic roads on lower-volume, easier-riding neighborhood streets.
The efforts began in earnest after the rollout of the city’s 2011 Bike Master Plan, which showed how Rochester could better accommodate cyclists. City officials will refresh that document as part of the ongoing Comprehensive Plan update.
“We’ve certainly got a lot of room to improve and we’re committed to doing that,” says Erik Frisch, the city’s transportation specialist.
The League of American Bicyclists recognized Rochester as a Bronze-level Bicycle Friendly Community in 2012 and renewed that designation in November. Cycling advocates and officials want to try for Silver-level status when the city reapplies in 2020. But to earn the designation, Rochester will need to make substantial gains.
For example, the League wants city officials to convene a bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee, devote more transportation funding to bike projects, and add more bike accommodations to city streets. It wants more people to commute by bike, too.
The League also wants to see a drop in car-bike collisions in Rochester and better educational efforts; the city and some local organizations plan to partner on an education and outreach campaign.
“I do feel like the city has been very proactive,” Cerosaletti says.
The city needs more protected bike lanes, which incorporate a barrier between riders and automobile traffic, to truly boost the number of people cycling around Rochester, Cerosaletti says.
“Those are the sort of accommodations that are going to be more comfortable for casual cyclists and they’re really going to open the door for more people, whether they’re young or older, or simply aren’t accustomed to getting out regularly,” he says.
The city is working on it. It’s building a cycle track as part of the project to fill in a portion of the Inner Loop, for example. Cycle tracks tie into intersections and are essentially parallel, bike-only streets.
Alex Freeman goes on a bike rant from CITY Newspaper on Vimeo.
The Inner Loop track will cover three-quarters of a mile from the Howell-Monroe-Chestnut intersection to University Avenue. It’s supposed to be finished next year, as is another track on Elmwood Avenue, alongside the University of Rochester campus.
Cycle tracks will likely be included in future road projects. The city tried to include one that would have started downtown and ended at North Goodman Street into next year’s East Main Street resurfacing project. But funding constraints limited the city to bike lanes instead.
The city also installed removable reflective posts along the North Chestnut Street bike lanes between Main Street and the University-Andrews intersection; the posts will be removed for the winter plowing seasons. It plans to use similar posts to buffer bike lanes on the Broad Street bridge, which is currently being resurfaced.
But some tight, high-volume roads continue to pose challenges, and several lack bike accommodations, says Richard DeSarra, another Rochester Cycling Alliance board member. For example, Lake Avenue only has bike lanes north of Route 104, even though it’s an important north-south route. The southern section doesn’t have enough space to add lanes.
Lake is a problem for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists, largely due to its design, traffic volumes, and the speed some drivers travel. Any fixes will probably be complicated and costly, since the road would have to be redesigned and rebuilt.
In cases such as Lake Avenue, however, the city can provide alternative routes, which is where bicycle boulevards come into play. Planners have laid out 50 miles of routes around Rochester, says the city’s Frisch.
The city completed its first bike boulevard this year along Hillside Avenue, Harvard Street, and Canterbury Road. It has two planned for 2017, with more possible if state or federal funding comes through.
One route will follow Pershing Drive and Lyceum Street, paralleling difficult sections of North Goodman and Culver Road. The other will pass through Bartlett Street, Frost Avenue, and Rugby Avenue in the southwest.
“You have to look at developing an interconnected, citywide, low-stress bike network,” Frisch says. “And that’s going to consist of bike boulevards, the trails, and protected lanes.”
A couple of other lingering problems frustrate cyclists, even infrequent riders.
Certain traffic signals are a pain because bicycles won’t activate the sensors that trigger the lights. Riders can wait until a car rolls up, or they can make a break for it if they see a gap in traffic. The latter solution isn’t safe (or legal), but it’s common.
City staff and local cycling advocates are working with Monroe County on the problem, since the county operates the city’s traffic signals. The county will place video detection equipment at intersections that are part of bike boulevards or that have certain bike accommodations, Frisch says.
Parking can also be a problem. The city, neighborhood groups, and local businesses have installed bike racks all over the place. Still, in some areas, there aren’t enough racks or there’s no place to securely lock up a bike.
The solution is to ask for a rack. City staff members review the requests and install the racks as long as they’re in public areas and will receive adequate public use. Advocates say the city has been very responsive to requests.
City officials also hope that Rochester’s new Zagster-operated bike share system, which opens next year, relieves some of the bike parking anxiety. People will be able to check out a bike at one station and drop it off at another.
“Arguably, the No. 1 thing that’s going to prevent somebody from riding a bike to the store, to meet friends at a bar, whatever the case may be, is if there isn’t adequate and reliable bike parking,” Frisch says. “We’re never going to get anywhere if there isn’t that.
This article appears in Dec 7-13, 2016.







Even if you love your car and would never, ever, get out of it to ride a bike instead, others will and that will help you offset your carbon emissions, make your community more attractive and safe to life in, and provide a transportation mode more economically feasible for those who cannot afford a car.
Respect bicyclists, respect pedestrians, be predictable, follow the laws (which are the same for bicyclists and car drivers), and make Rochester an even better Bicycle Friendly Community so that the Citys Climate Action Plan is more likely to result in a sustainable future.
Oh, and read this great article mindful of all the efforts that have gone into making Rochester more livable via its transportation system:
More on Transportation in our area: http://rochesterenvironment.com/communting…
More on the Citys Climate Action Plan: http://www.cityofrochester.gov/climateacti…
I just don’t believe bike lanes are safe… between car doors opening and 30 mph traffic, I will stick to the canal path. Rochester needs to study Bogota, Columbia for better ideas on safe biking.
http://www.streetfilms.org/riding-bogotas-…
How are these bike lanes being paid for?
J: Presumably being paid for the same way all road maintenance is paid for, to keep the roads safe and clearly marked for all legal vehicular traffic. Also, the article specifically mentions state and federal funding being an option.
Rather than an extravagance or a squandering away of our tax dollars, active transportation (walking and bicycling) are real transportation options for thousands of our tax-paying residences.
With relatively little money, compared to the very expensive tax dollars needed for our gas-guzzling dominated infrastructure, increasing active transportation provides tremendous returns in health, safety, environmental responsibility, and a more attractive community to live in.
Transportation in our future is going to include many modes for getting around. Active transportation is by far cheaper and more efficient than any other mode of transportationnot to mention its more fair and just.
Having a respectable bike infrastructure is one way to compete as a city. However, the the bike lanes, as of yet, are underused, and vastly so. The portion of Dewey Ave. that I’m familiar with has lost parking on one side of the street in favor of bike lanes on both sides. People drive in the lanes. They walk in the lanes. And why not? There aren’t any bikes!
Things would change if more people bicycled. Being able to ride a bike from point A to point B is an important quality of life issue. Most of our entertainment nowadays has to do with sitting on a couch and interacting with a screen. We forget how great it is to get out and have some fun.
Bicycle lanes are far from a perfect solution and just buying a bike doesn’t mean you’re ever going to use it. Still, bicycle riding is something for many of us to consider. Oh, and if you still think riding a bike is a big waste of time, just remember this quote from Albert Einstein on the theory of relativity: “I thought of that while riding my bicycle.”
I mostly agree with Alex Freeman’s rant – mostly. Absolutely, the city should continuing building out a bike-friendly highway system. As is, it is too disjointed to inspire use – the bike lanes come and go, and while the notion of the so-called bike boulevards is interesting, the ONE that we have is barely helpful to anyone. I live about 200 yards from it and only use it to get to Highland Ave and out of the city to where pleasure riding is faster, safer, and less interrupted.
The keys to increasing bicycle commuting and pleasure riding in the city, as the article points out, are safe routes and adequate bicycle parking – to which I would add a whole lot of education, for bicyclists and motorists alike. I long ago lost count of how many bicyclists I see doing stupid things – primarily riding against traffic and/or riding right through stop signs and stop lights, but also riding in twos and threes abreast, not using signals ahead of turns, etc. And motorists…actually, I think 99.99% of motorists are respectful and give me plenty of room. Just every once in a while, I run into the nimrod or ignoramus who thinks I should be on a sidewalk or not in a traffic lane at a stoplight – or who cuts me off (never sure whether they didn’t see me or didn’t care – but I am 6’3″ and dress like a neon banana on my bike, with lights flashing front and back).
We have miles and miles and miles to go here on safe bicycle routes. We need more bike lanes at a minimum, and preferably more protected ones, connected to each other and following or paralleling the major arteries around the city. Until we have that, ordinary riders will be too fearful to tackle our city streets.
Where I disagree with Alex – but only slightly, because I definitely understand his point – is that it’s still wrong to ride through a red light, even after stopping completely and with no traffic around or in the pouring rain. Why? Only because some ***hole is likely to see it and say, “SEE???? THAT’S WHAT I HATE ABOUT $@#$ BICYCLISTS!!!!!” If I’m already soaked, what’s the diff? I wait it out.
“Where I disagree with Alex – but only slightly, because I definitely understand his point – is that it’s still wrong to ride through a red light, even after stopping completely and with no traffic around or in the pouring rain. “
There is a significant difference between “wrong” and “illegal”. Blowing a red light at an empty intersection is illegal, not wrong. Furthermore, these archaic, ineffective traffic laws that are indiscriminately applied to cyclists are slowly being phased out across the country. If the act of blowing a red light at an empty intersection gives a person cause to hate on cyclists, odds are they were looking for an excuse to justify an existing negative bias in the first place.
Those are the types of people that shouldn’t be licensed to operate a motor vehicle. Unfortunately, critical thinking and reason isn’t a prerequisite to obtain a license.
A great article on why Alex’s experience/viewpoint show just how immature our cycling infrastructure/culture really is: http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2016/01/praise-slow-cycling/