This city has gone through a stunning loss of industrial
jobs, so it’s not surprising that the photonics institute announcement
dominated the news last week. We’ll be the headquarters! We won a national
competition! The vice president of the United States came to town! And
Rochester has been celebrating ever since.

I’ve been celebrating, too. It’s about time. I’m tired of us
being kicked in the face. I’ve been mad ever since the company formerly known
as Gannett decided that we weren’t good enough to house its national
headquarters. Xerox has shrunk. Bausch and Lomb has
been bought. And Kodak? How could company executives let that
happen?

At long last, somebody recognizes our value.

No one knows yet how many jobs the institute will create, and
the jobs won’t all be located here. We’ll be the headquarters, the hub of the
research and development, but the manufacturing
itself, the jobs that grow out of the institute, could be anywhere. Being the
headquarters could attract companies in that industry to locate here, though.
Community leaders’ words of enthusiasm aren’t hyperbole. This is a big deal.

And as happy as I am about our selection as the photonics
institute’s headquarters, I’m almost as happy about what University of
Rochester president Joel Seligman did soon after the formal announcement.

In the media frenzy leading up to that announcement, there
were reports that the institute’s headquarters would be in the suburbs, at the
Canal Ponds Business Park in Greece. The big announcement to-do, with the vice
president beaming his high-wattage smile, was held in the business park.

But Seligman, whose institution was involved in bidding for
the headquarters, was having none of that. “Rochester,
and I mean the City of Rochester, will be the headquarters for this
effort,” he said at the big announcement. “There are discussions
going on. We’re looking at places like the Sibley building as the potential
headquarters.”

And when the Democrat and Chronicle editorial board
interviewed Seligman and SUNY Polytechnic president Alain Kaloyeros after the
announcement, Seligman was stronger: “There’s a high likelihood that the
business headquarters will be located in Sibley,” he said. “They’ve got the
space, and if we’re going to revitalize Rochester, it starts on Main Street.
Literally, it starts with the Sibley Building.”

The Sibley Building isn’t a done deal. Nobody has promised,
so far, that the photonics headquarters will be anywhere in the city. But
Seligman has done what too many community leaders have failed to do over the
years. They may insist that the city and its health are important. But then
they build in the suburbs, which nibbles away at that
health.

City elected officials, in administration after
administration, have pleaded and preached. And to get development, they’ve been
forced to offer incentives, tax breaks that other city taxpayers have to make
up for.

There have been successes, of course. Over the years, a few
business leaders have recognized the importance of a healthy downtown – have
understood that downtown’s health has a profound impact on everybody in the
region – and so companies like ESL and Nothnagle have moved their headquarters
in. New companies have sprung up in the core of downtown and in the High Falls
area.

And slowly, the momentum has been building. A growing number
of commercial and residential developers are creating new apartments, condos,
and office and retail space downtown. A small step at a time, downtown is
overcoming the loss of retail and big-deal professional firms.

And now a key non-government community leader – someone who
has enormous influence in regional development – has thrown down the gauntlet.
“If we’re going to revitalize Rochester, it starts on Main Street.”

I’m not anti-suburb. Not everyone wants to live or work in
the city. But if the city fails, we all do.“If we’re going to revitalize Rochester, it starts on Main Street.” Thank
you, Joel Seligman.

Mary Anna Towler is a transplant from the Southern Appalachians and is editor, co-publisher, and co-founder of City. She is happy to have converted a shy but opinionated childhood into an adult job. She...

4 replies on “Seligman’s very big plan for the very big deal”

  1. Agreed, period. The only question that will remain is how many of those jobs will be filled by the urban residents,….you know, City of Rochester residents? While we’re on this once in a lifetime “ride”, lets also fix the educational crisis. Lets give those urban kids the opportunity to land one of those jobs. If you “allow” the suburbanite to take all those city jobs,….well you have only taken advantage of half the “gift”.

  2. I just hope they don’t get revitalizing downtown Rochester mixed up with the photonics deal and fail at both.

    I think it should be probably a 4 story building located on Crittenden rd, smack in the middle of UR, RIT and MCC, with a new road connecting RIT and UR. Just look at it on google. Theres got to be hundreds of acres there.

  3. Crittenden Road is an abysmal and dead-end idea. The area is heavily car-focused, and with increasing numbers of workers functioning off alternative/active transportation, a Crittenden location just doesn’t work as a long-term notion.

    Sibley is a GREAT choice. The public realm and Main Street of Rochester needs a huge revitalization infusion, and a revamping in terms of transportation and place-making design. The City of Rochester is already making plans for redesigning East Main to focus less on cars and more on other means of transportation (google up the recent East Main Arts & Market Plan). The choice of Sibley would particularly dovetail with such plans, especially as more people of the younger working generation move to the Southeast Quadrant, them being not exactly fans of car ownership. The Southeast Quadrant would become even more of a fantastic place to work, play, and eat, with less cars cluttering up the whole place (tell me about it, I live in the SE Quadrant and bike-commute to my workplace of RIT on the nearby Genesee Riverway Trail and have everything easily accessible by bike at home – it’s heaven).

  4. Connecting Kendrick Rd to John St, with the photonics center at the intersection of Crittenden is the perfect location. UR is about 2000′ to the north, RIT about 3000′ to the south and MCC about 3/4 mile to the east. The area will fill up rapidly and I’m sure have shuttles and other transportation. Much closer and easier access than downtown.

    I want downtown revitalized as much as anyone. I’m just concerned from some of the dialog that the focus has turned towards downtown and poverty and not on the core mission. Focus on photonics and building the region with the gift we’ve been given. Do it right. Put it in the BEST location for the Photonics Center, not where we WISH was the best location. That’s the best thing we can do to help the other causes in our region.

Comments are closed.