Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump during a Rochester-area rally earlier this year. Credit: FILE PHOTO

While Donald Trump was pulling the presidential campaign further into the slime this past weekend, our oldest grandson was debating public policy in a competition that drew teams from around the country.

Our grandson, a junior in a large public school, is a devoted debater. At debate camp this past summer, he spent seven weeks studying and arguing the year’s competition topic: Whether the US should increase its trade and diplomatic efforts with China.

At the moment, public-policy debating dominates this teenager’s extracurricular life – as it does for his debate-team partner and for many of the other high school debaters who participate in these competitions. They spend their weekends focusing on public policy.

On vacation with our grandson in August, I asked him what he was thinking about for a career. His answer: politics, maybe.

Politics.

Later, on a drive through the rolling hills of northern Michigan, past farms and orchards, his face erupted into a big smile. The view made him “feel patriotic,” he said. “It makes me think: ‘This is America.’”

I tried to keep that memory in my mind Sunday night as I watched the ugliness of today’s national politics spew out on the stage at Washington University. This, too – to the horror of many of us – is America.

Nobody should have needed the weekend’s shocking developments to recognize the danger of putting Donald Trump in the White House. He has demonstrated enough ignorance, prejudice, and emotional instability to prove that he’s a threat to national security and a whole lot more. And it says a lot about the Republican Party’s leaders that they didn’t disown him long ago.

But Trump’s comments about women, in a taped discussion with NBC’s Billy Bush, add a frightening new layer of concern.

We have moved way, way beyond Trump calling women “pigs” and insulting them for their looks. Now we’ve heard him brag about his sexual-assault prowess.

Here’s how the US Department of Justice defines sexual assault: “any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient. Falling under the definition of sexual assault are sexual activities [such] as forced sexual intercourse, forcible sodomy, child molestation, incest, fondling, and attempted rape.”

Any type of sexual contact or behavior without the explicit consent of the recipient.

That most certainly includes grabbing women in the way Trump described.

“When you’re a star,” he said, “they let you do it. You can do anything.”

Nearly as shocking as Trump’s comments: the casual way he made them – and the knowing, admiring way that Billy Bush joined in on the banter.

Also nearly as shocking has been the defense from Trump and some of his supporters about his behavior: that it was just locker-room talk.

Bragging about easy success at committing a crime is just harmless guy talk? Sorry. To many women, the image of unwanted kissing and fondling is chilling. Intimidating. And all too familiar.

Nor is that “locker room talk” harmless. It is demeaning to women, viewing them as no more than objects for men’s sexual gratification. It is a mindset that far too often leads to the fondling and groping that Donald Trump bragged about. And to much worse than that.

This is the state of politics today. We had already lost the willingness to seek bipartisan solutions to the challenges of the day. Now, as one of our democracy’s examples of leadership, we have a self-described sexual predator.

All around the country, hundreds of high school students interested in learning about their nation’s policy challenges are studying and debating. And they’re learning to argue both sides, the affirmative side in this debate, negative the next.

That’s a good lesson in politics. In bipartisanship. In understanding both sides of an issue. It’s good training for a future politician.

Sadly, I find myself hoping that’s not the career our grandson pursues.

Mary Anna Towler is a transplant from the Southern Appalachians and is editor, co-publisher, and co-founder of City. She is happy to have converted a shy but opinionated childhood into an adult job. She...

5 replies on “Trump’s assault ‘banter’: democracy’s latest hit”

  1. This whole smear thing on Donald Trump is a mere distraction from the real issues of this campaign. There are major differences in policies between the candidates and that is what should be discussed at these debates. Instead, the debate questions focused on “he said, she said” and personal attacks on Trump; which in turn forced him to attack Hillary Clinton, in defense.

    Who could blame Trump for defending himself by pointing out that Hillary Clinton has enabled Bill Clinton when he actually did sexually assault women, as evidenced by him paying over $800,000 in retributions to one of his victims, to avoid going to court.
    That Hillary attacked all the women that came forward to testify against her predatory husband, certainly shows that she does not support all women, as she claims and that she enables her husband.

    I find it astounding that the media and Clinton supporters simply turned their heads when Bill Clinton actually committed these sexual assaults and then hypocritically pounce on Trump for saying inappropriate words against women, eleven years ago.
    What happened to “actions speaks louder than words”? Not so with the Clintons and the bias news media.
    The media and Clinton supporters have smothered the predatory actions of Bill Clinton, yet brought the inappropriate words of Trump to the forefront of this election to divert the public from the real issues facing this nation; like the economy, jobs, radical Islamic terrorism, border security, health care and change in Washington.

    When the Clinton campaign, some Republicans and the bias media have nothing but negative attacks on their opponent, it tells me that they are not in agreement with what many people believe in this country. Many believe that a major change in the Washington establishment and government is needed because the country is going in the wrong direction; and, that the change includes cleaning out both parties.

    So now it seems that many Republicans, the Democrats and the media have joined forces to keep the statis quo in Washington and keep change from happening. We’ll see what the people have to say about that, in November.

    Mary Anna, it’s great that your grandson is getting debate experience; those skills can be applied to many other fields. not just politics. I hope he sees that politicians need to have thick skin and ultimately a drive for power and control. Does that sound like something your grandson may have and aspire to?

  2. The campaigns of both Clinton and Trump should sway voters to either Jill Stein or Gary Johnson.

  3. Even before Jill Stein said Trump was the “lesser evil,” she demonstrated she is a complete idiot. She will poll under her current 2% – her voters being almost entirely comfortable white people.

  4. How did conservative pundit and certified climate change-denier, George Will, put on on Monday? “[Trump’s campaign theme? His Cleveland convention was a mini-Nuremberg rally for Republicans whose three-word recipe for making America great again was to shriek ‘Lock her up!’ This presages his banana-republican vow to imprison his opponent.”

    We will save for another time George Will’s numerous contributions to the banana-republicazation of America.

  5. I have the occasional displeasure of when buying my Lunch, having to read articles by Mary Anna Towler, what bloviating garbage. Sorry, calling it for what it is.

Comments are closed.