It
was a huge coup for the Rochester Broadway Theatre League to book a run of the Broadway
smash “The Book of Mormon” during its first national tour. Local audiences have
taken advantage of the opportunity, with the six-night stand of the Tony-,
Grammy-, and Drama Desk-winning musical completely selling out the Auditorium
Theatre, save for the 20 tickets set aside for a lottery before each night’s
performance. Nabbing one of those tickets might qualify as a minor miracle, but
it’s worth the effort. The show is an instant modern musical classic, and a
spectacle in every sense of the word.

As
you might expect, “The Book of Mormon” concerns Mormonism, the religion founded
in the 19th century by Joseph Smith right down the road from Rochester in
Palmyra. It’s not the first play to explore the fascinating faith — Tony
Kushner notably delved into it with his opus, “Angels in America.” But “Book”
has drawn criticism for its handling of the comparatively new religion largely
because of the creative forces behind it, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the duo
behind long-running satirical cartoon “South Park.”

Parker
and Stone are known for their crass, often sophomoric humor, and that has
undoubtedly colored some of the response to “The Book of Mormon.” Before the
show even opened in Rochester, City Newspaper received comments on its website from
people decrying the musical’s flippant treatment of the Mormon faith. I’m
curious if those commenters even bothered seeing the show before they criticized
it, because honestly, I thought the Mormons in “The Book of Mormon” were
treated with remarkable kindness by creators who have the capacity for extreme
cruelty.

Yes,
the show shines a light on some of the more outrageous claims in the Mormon
faith (although it rarely comments on them directly; it just lays them out
there for the audience to take in). And the proceedings are awash in coarse
language and frat-boy-adjacent jokes. But the Mormon missionaries who serve as
the protagonists are almost exclusively portrayed as kind, well-meaning people
who are at times a bit clueless and misguided. By the end I was surprised to
find that the same men who showed Satan and Saddam Hussein engaged in explicit
gay sex in the “South Park” movie have given us a musical that ultimately
positions organized religion — and Mormonism in particular — as flawed but
capable of making important change in the lives of people who truly need it.

As
for the touring production currently in Rochester, it’s fantastic. The cast is
filled with exciting song-and-dance numbers, some of the sets are truly
spectacular (especially for a road show), and the show itself immediately grabs
your attention and actually gets better as it goes along. (The second act is much
better paced than the first.)

The
action follows young Mormon missionaries Elder Price and Elder Cunningham as
they are sent on their church-directed assignment to a remote village in
Uganda. Elder Price is a smart, ambitious young man who longs to please his
parents, his church, and his god. He is also, as Jesus blatantly tells him at
one point in the play, kind of a dick. Elder Cunningham is a bit of a lost
sheep, a social outcast who wants to be liked but who has a little problem with
compulsive lying. The two of them join a group of impressively chipper
missionaries trying to spread the word of the Third Testament to a town ravaged
by poverty, famine, and AIDS, and dealing with a warlord who wants to mutilate
the village’s women. The missionaries are forced to confront the reality of the
situation vs. what the church told them to expect, wrestle with their own
doubts about faith, and come up with some creative solutions to their problems.
And they do all of this while singing and dancing, and occasionally interacting
with historical reenactments of Joseph Smith, Jesus, and the angel Moroni, with show-stopping cameos by Satan, Hitler, Jeffrey
Dahmer, and Johnnie Cochran.

The
cast of the show is truly impressive. Mark Evans plays the role of Elder Price
(Broadway star Gavin Creel was said to be playing the role when the show was
initially announced), and he is a spectacular talent. He’s got a huge voice,
great range, tremendous dancing and physicality, and a fantastic presence. He
stands out even on a crowded stage. Christopher John O’Neill makes his
professional theater debut as Elder Cunningham, and for the most part he puts
his sketch-comedy background to great use, delivering a very funny performance.
But on Tuesday night O’Neill had one major down moment, as he delivered an underwhelming
performance in the closing number to Act 1, “Man Up.” I’m not sure if O’Neill’s
concentration broke, or he was uncomfortable with what was being asked of him,
but he turned in an oddly distracted-feeling performance in a song that is
designed to build to a huge moment.

Samantha
Marie Ware plays the main female role, Nabulungi, and
has one of the most astonishing female voices I’ve ever heard at an RBTL show; her
singing pierces the soul. The only problem I had was that it was hard to make
out many of the lyrics in her big ballad, “Sal TlayKaSiti,” because she was singing
with such an intense accent. That’s a necessity of the character and script,
however, and I’m not sure how you get around it.

The
ensemble is stacked with great talent, and the show features some tremendous
group numbers. The opening number “Hello” sets the upbeat tone for the show,
and whenever the all-male missionaries get together, you get some lovely male
harmonies — and in the case of “Turn it Off,” some delightful tap dancing.

Lastly,
“Spooky Mormon Hell Dream” is one of the most glorious sequences I’ve ever seen
produced on stage. I sat through it enraptured, mouth agape, and immediately
longing to see it again. It was truly a religious experience.

Related Stories

8 replies on “Theater Review: “The Book of Mormon””

  1. I’m wondering why there aren’t protests or outrage about this mocking of religion. You would certainly hear about it if RBTL was hosting a production called ‘The Book of Islam’ or a musical based on Salmon Rushdie’s ‘Satanic Verses’ or a ‘Burka Chorus Line’. At least ‘Nunsense’ was purportedly made by Catholics. The Book of Mormon was created by the producers of South Park who are not of the Mormon faith. I give the Mormons credit for taking a civilized approach, offering to educate and inform the public about their religion rather than protesting this musical. Still, you would think that other concerned citizens would express support by at least discussing the question of the appropriateness of this production.

  2. @ Darius

    If someone were to produce a funny award-winning musical about any other religion, I’d line up to see it. What’s not to love about the light of reason & truth being shone on any of the world’s religions to reveal that they’re all nothing but mythology and superstition?

  3. Darius: I’m curious, have you even seen “The Book of Mormon”? Or are you just assuming it’s offensive because of the creators behind it? Because truthfully, I found the Mormon missionaries depicted in the show to be treated relatively well. The religion certainly isn’t demonized here. In fact, it is shown as having an extremely positive impact on a community that desperately needed help.

    I also think it’s worth noting that the Church of Latter Day Saints took out not one, not two, but THREE full-page ads in the program for the show encouraging people interested in learning more about their religion to come to the church. If they’re embracing the show in the spirit in which it was intended, I’m not clear on why a supposed non-Mormon is leaving multiple comments decrying its approach.

  4. I have no desire to see a musical full of “coarse language and frat-boy-adjacent jokes” and “cameos by Satan, Hitler, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Johnnie Cochran”. I’m just not into that. My point is that the politically correct crowd is offended (or downright frightened) when Islam is satirized, but Christians are fair game. As I said, the Mormons are a class act, turning the other cheek and all (very Christian of them).

  5. If I’m understanding you correctly, Darius, you are saying that it’s only okay for the members of a religion to talk about or criticize the religion, even if said religion’s doctrine has influence on how non-members are allowed to live their lives (see the Mormon influence on Prop 8, please)? That amounts to nothing more than PR, and doesn’t serve to introduce the public to the reality of the religion.
    The Mormons don’t need our support if they are the object of satire. The gays kids who are born into the religion and cast out of the house need our support, for example.
    Allowing religious doctrine to be immune to discussion and criticism is a very dangerous stance to take.

  6. I’m not against the right of free speech and criticism of anything. I’m saying there is a double standard when it comes to satire and criticism of religion as it applies to Christian religions and Islam.

  7. There IS a double standard; Darius is right. And we know why but seldom dare state it.

Comments are closed.